Skip to content
CHI 2019 conference in Glasgow, Scotland

Design Lab Weaves the Threads of CHI 2019

Design Lab Weaves the Threads of CHI 2019

Design Lab Weaves the Threads of CHI 2019

From May 4-9, 2019, the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems took place in Glasgow, Scotland. Called “CHI” for short, this annual and prominent event brings together thousands of the world’s leading researchers, designers, and scientists in human-computer interaction. 

Design Lab members walked away with a number of awards for their research. Post-doctoral Fellow Sarah Fox won a Best Paper Award for “Managerial Visions: Stories of upgrading and maintaining the public restroom with IoT”. Honorable Mentions went to Graduate Student Dorothy Howard and Professor Lilly Irani for “Ways of Knowing When Research Subjects Care”, and Graduate Student Sean Kross and Professor Philip Guo for “Practitioners Teaching Data Science in Industry and Academia”.


Pictured Left to Right: Ailie Fraser, Tricia Ngoon

Graudate Students Ailie Fraser and Tricia Ngoon, and Professor Scott Klemmer also received an Honorable Mention for “RePlay: Contextually Presenting Learning Videos Across Software Applications”. “A lot of the time when you’re working in complex software, you’ll end up searching the internet for some kind of help … but it can be really hard to sift through all the search results, and figure out what parts are relevant to you and your particular task,” says Fraser. “We built a system called RePlay that supports you across different applications as you’re working, and makes it easier to find relevant help.”

CHI attracts people from many disciplines around the world within HCI, giving attendees the chance to interact with different fields of research. 


Pictured: Tricia Ngoon

Ngoon participated in a Doctoral Consortium, where students present their thesis work and receive feedback from peers and faculty mentors. “What I liked about it was that you got to hear from these very different spectrums of research, and because it’s CHI and it’s so broad, I don’t think you’d get that elsewhere because it’s a little more niche,” Ngoon says. 

This year, some Design Lab attendees chose to focus on talks or sessions from subfields outside their core research areas. 

The first session I went to was on social justice, but the work in that domain is relevant and interesting being that they talked about things like resources for domestic abuse victims, and the design space of how do you help these people. One of the takeaways from that talk was the idea that if we designed for everyone, we couldn’t help anyone [because] services would be flooded and they wouldn’t be able to prioritize anyone,” says graduate student Steven Rick. “I thought that was really nice to think about because in health that’s very much a problem — you only have so much bandwidth, you only have so many resources you can provide. Not only do we want people in rural places to see specialists, but specialists also need to see people who are close to them, and one neurologist can’t see 100 patients a day. So, how do you design to resolve those inherent bottlenecks or even think about those bottlenecks at all.”

Listening to talks from other subfields was also valuable for Ph.D. student Sean Kross. “Even though the talk might be in a completely different field that isn’t directly related to what I do, it’s important to go out and see what other people are interested in and what their discoveries are. I think that those findings do have a major impact on how I think about my work,” he says. “One strategy is you can take a method that other researchers have already validated, and you can apply that to something else. Talks make me reconsider what tools I take for granted in my life that I could translate into something useful or innovative in my research.”


Pictured Left to Right: Sean Kross, Ailie Fraser, Tricia Ngoon, Steven Rick

CHI’s attendance has been growing every year; in 2018, the conference surpassed 3,000 participants, and that number is only increasing. Because of the large nature of the conference, workshops are a great way to connect with a smaller group of people. 

I really enjoyed the [live streaming] workshop that I attended because it gave me a chance to do some very interactive, collaborative work with a small group of people,” says Fraser. “This one had around 15 people, so it was very intimate. We spent the first hour or two on presentations, but really the rest of the day was generating ideas, working together and brainstorming, and sticking post-it notes everywhere. So that was really fun; I feel like we came up with a bunch of interesting ideas, and I made a lot of great connections that I hope to follow up on.” 

This year marked the first time CHI was held in Scotland. “My last name is Fraser, which is a [Scottish] clan, and my first name is also Scottish, so it was really cool to get to go and see a lot of the culture there and the history,” says Fraser. “I think it was a very welcoming place, which is nice for CHI; lots of bagpipes, lots of music everywhere, and everyone was very nice and very friendly.” 

The 2019 conference theme was “Weaving the Threads of CHI,” and CHI has once again proven to be an amazing platform to gather the greater HCI community to focus on advances in interactive technology. 


Pictured Left to Right: Nadir Weibel, Ailie Fraser, Dorothy Howard, Tricia Ngoon, Sean Kross, Steven Rick, Danilo Gasques Rodrigues

It might sound a little negative, but you don’t go to conferences to read papers and listen to talks. That’s a nice side effect of the fact that you’re all gathering under a common theme, so you can get together and listen to research and think about interesting stuff,” says Rick. “But at its core, you go for the network. You go to see people, to talk, to do stuff that’s not explicitly tied to the papers that are being presented. Because they’re all going to end up online, and you’ll read them later, and you hope that the talks give you something that’s not in the paper, and the conversations you have after the talks with the authors prompt an idea or thought that neither of you thought of, or build a collaboration or give you access to something that you didn’t have. You’re looking for a mutually beneficial social experience.


CHI 2019 Design Lab Publications:

How Guiding Questions Facilitate Feedback Exchange in Project-Based Learning, Amy Cook, Jessica Hammer, Salma Elsayed-Ali, and Steven P. Dow. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Inventive Scaffolds Catalyze Creative Learning, Tricia J. Ngoon. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Abstract from Doctoral Consortium

Managerial Visions: Stories of upgrading and maintaining the public restroom with IoT, Sarah Fox, Kiley Sobel, Daniela Rosner. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Practitioners Teaching Data Science in Industry and Academia, Sean Kross, Philip Guo. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

RePlay: Contextually Presenting Learning Videos Across Software Applications, C. Ailie Fraser, Tricia J. Ngoon, Mira Dontcheva, Scott Klemmer. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Social Applications for Inbodied Interaction: Improving Health Outcomes by Integrating Personal Knowledge, Community, and Data, Vineet Pandey. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Workshop Paper

Ways of Knowing When Research Subjects Care, Dorothy Howard, Lilly Irani. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

From May 4-9, 2019, the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems took place in Glasgow, Scotland. Called “CHI” for short, this annual and prominent event brings together thousands of the world’s leading researchers, designers, and scientists in human-computer interaction. 

Design Lab members walked away with a number of awards for their research. Post-doctoral Fellow Sarah Fox won a Best Paper Award for “Managerial Visions: Stories of upgrading and maintaining the public restroom with IoT”. Honorable Mentions went to Graduate Student Dorothy Howard and Professor Lilly Irani for “Ways of Knowing When Research Subjects Care”, and Graduate Student Sean Kross and Professor Philip Guo for “Practitioners Teaching Data Science in Industry and Academia”.


Pictured Left to Right: Ailie Fraser, Tricia Ngoon

Graudate Students Ailie Fraser and Tricia Ngoon, and Professor Scott Klemmer also received an Honorable Mention for “RePlay: Contextually Presenting Learning Videos Across Software Applications”. “A lot of the time when you’re working in complex software, you’ll end up searching the internet for some kind of help … but it can be really hard to sift through all the search results, and figure out what parts are relevant to you and your particular task,” says Fraser. “We built a system called RePlay that supports you across different applications as you’re working, and makes it easier to find relevant help.”

CHI attracts people from many disciplines around the world within HCI, giving attendees the chance to interact with different fields of research. 


Pictured: Tricia Ngoon

Ngoon participated in a Doctoral Consortium, where students present their thesis work and receive feedback from peers and faculty mentors. “What I liked about it was that you got to hear from these very different spectrums of research, and because it’s CHI and it’s so broad, I don’t think you’d get that elsewhere because it’s a little more niche,” Ngoon says. 

This year, some Design Lab attendees chose to focus on talks or sessions from subfields outside their core research areas. 

The first session I went to was on social justice, but the work in that domain is relevant and interesting being that they talked about things like resources for domestic abuse victims, and the design space of how do you help these people. One of the takeaways from that talk was the idea that if we designed for everyone, we couldn’t help anyone [because] services would be flooded and they wouldn’t be able to prioritize anyone,” says graduate student Steven Rick. “I thought that was really nice to think about because in health that’s very much a problem — you only have so much bandwidth, you only have so many resources you can provide. Not only do we want people in rural places to see specialists, but specialists also need to see people who are close to them, and one neurologist can’t see 100 patients a day. So, how do you design to resolve those inherent bottlenecks or even think about those bottlenecks at all.”

Listening to talks from other subfields was also valuable for Ph.D. student Sean Kross. “Even though the talk might be in a completely different field that isn’t directly related to what I do, it’s important to go out and see what other people are interested in and what their discoveries are. I think that those findings do have a major impact on how I think about my work,” he says. “One strategy is you can take a method that other researchers have already validated, and you can apply that to something else. Talks make me reconsider what tools I take for granted in my life that I could translate into something useful or innovative in my research.”


Pictured Left to Right: Sean Kross, Ailie Fraser, Tricia Ngoon, Steven Rick

CHI’s attendance has been growing every year; in 2018, the conference surpassed 3,000 participants, and that number is only increasing. Because of the large nature of the conference, workshops are a great way to connect with a smaller group of people. 

I really enjoyed the [live streaming] workshop that I attended because it gave me a chance to do some very interactive, collaborative work with a small group of people,” says Fraser. “This one had around 15 people, so it was very intimate. We spent the first hour or two on presentations, but really the rest of the day was generating ideas, working together and brainstorming, and sticking post-it notes everywhere. So that was really fun; I feel like we came up with a bunch of interesting ideas, and I made a lot of great connections that I hope to follow up on.” 

This year marked the first time CHI was held in Scotland. “My last name is Fraser, which is a [Scottish] clan, and my first name is also Scottish, so it was really cool to get to go and see a lot of the culture there and the history,” says Fraser. “I think it was a very welcoming place, which is nice for CHI; lots of bagpipes, lots of music everywhere, and everyone was very nice and very friendly.” 

The 2019 conference theme was “Weaving the Threads of CHI,” and CHI has once again proven to be an amazing platform to gather the greater HCI community to focus on advances in interactive technology. 


Pictured Left to Right: Nadir Weibel, Ailie Fraser, Dorothy Howard, Tricia Ngoon, Sean Kross, Steven Rick, Danilo Gasques Rodrigues

It might sound a little negative, but you don’t go to conferences to read papers and listen to talks. That’s a nice side effect of the fact that you’re all gathering under a common theme, so you can get together and listen to research and think about interesting stuff,” says Rick. “But at its core, you go for the network. You go to see people, to talk, to do stuff that’s not explicitly tied to the papers that are being presented. Because they’re all going to end up online, and you’ll read them later, and you hope that the talks give you something that’s not in the paper, and the conversations you have after the talks with the authors prompt an idea or thought that neither of you thought of, or build a collaboration or give you access to something that you didn’t have. You’re looking for a mutually beneficial social experience.


CHI 2019 Design Lab Publications:

How Guiding Questions Facilitate Feedback Exchange in Project-Based Learning, Amy Cook, Jessica Hammer, Salma Elsayed-Ali, and Steven P. Dow. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Inventive Scaffolds Catalyze Creative Learning, Tricia J. Ngoon. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Abstract from Doctoral Consortium

Managerial Visions: Stories of upgrading and maintaining the public restroom with IoT, Sarah Fox, Kiley Sobel, Daniela Rosner. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Practitioners Teaching Data Science in Industry and Academia, Sean Kross, Philip Guo. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

RePlay: Contextually Presenting Learning Videos Across Software Applications, C. Ailie Fraser, Tricia J. Ngoon, Mira Dontcheva, Scott Klemmer. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Social Applications for Inbodied Interaction: Improving Health Outcomes by Integrating Personal Knowledge, Community, and Data, Vineet Pandey. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Workshop Paper

Ways of Knowing When Research Subjects Care, Dorothy Howard, Lilly Irani. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

From May 4-9, 2019, the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems took place in Glasgow, Scotland. Called “CHI” for short, this annual and prominent event brings together thousands of the world’s leading researchers, designers, and scientists in human-computer interaction. 

Design Lab members walked away with a number of awards for their research. Post-doctoral Fellow Sarah Fox won a Best Paper Award for “Managerial Visions: Stories of upgrading and maintaining the public restroom with IoT”. Honorable Mentions went to Graduate Student Dorothy Howard and Professor Lilly Irani for “Ways of Knowing When Research Subjects Care”, and Graduate Student Sean Kross and Professor Philip Guo for “Practitioners Teaching Data Science in Industry and Academia”.


Pictured Left to Right: Ailie Fraser, Tricia Ngoon

Graudate Students Ailie Fraser and Tricia Ngoon, and Professor Scott Klemmer also received an Honorable Mention for “RePlay: Contextually Presenting Learning Videos Across Software Applications”. “A lot of the time when you’re working in complex software, you’ll end up searching the internet for some kind of help … but it can be really hard to sift through all the search results, and figure out what parts are relevant to you and your particular task,” says Fraser. “We built a system called RePlay that supports you across different applications as you’re working, and makes it easier to find relevant help.”

CHI attracts people from many disciplines around the world within HCI, giving attendees the chance to interact with different fields of research. 


Pictured: Tricia Ngoon

Ngoon participated in a Doctoral Consortium, where students present their thesis work and receive feedback from peers and faculty mentors. “What I liked about it was that you got to hear from these very different spectrums of research, and because it’s CHI and it’s so broad, I don’t think you’d get that elsewhere because it’s a little more niche,” Ngoon says. 

This year, some Design Lab attendees chose to focus on talks or sessions from subfields outside their core research areas. 

The first session I went to was on social justice, but the work in that domain is relevant and interesting being that they talked about things like resources for domestic abuse victims, and the design space of how do you help these people. One of the takeaways from that talk was the idea that if we designed for everyone, we couldn’t help anyone [because] services would be flooded and they wouldn’t be able to prioritize anyone,” says graduate student Steven Rick. “I thought that was really nice to think about because in health that’s very much a problem — you only have so much bandwidth, you only have so many resources you can provide. Not only do we want people in rural places to see specialists, but specialists also need to see people who are close to them, and one neurologist can’t see 100 patients a day. So, how do you design to resolve those inherent bottlenecks or even think about those bottlenecks at all.”

Listening to talks from other subfields was also valuable for Ph.D. student Sean Kross. “Even though the talk might be in a completely different field that isn’t directly related to what I do, it’s important to go out and see what other people are interested in and what their discoveries are. I think that those findings do have a major impact on how I think about my work,” he says. “One strategy is you can take a method that other researchers have already validated, and you can apply that to something else. Talks make me reconsider what tools I take for granted in my life that I could translate into something useful or innovative in my research.”


Pictured Left to Right: Sean Kross, Ailie Fraser, Tricia Ngoon, Steven Rick

CHI’s attendance has been growing every year; in 2018, the conference surpassed 3,000 participants, and that number is only increasing. Because of the large nature of the conference, workshops are a great way to connect with a smaller group of people. 

I really enjoyed the [live streaming] workshop that I attended because it gave me a chance to do some very interactive, collaborative work with a small group of people,” says Fraser. “This one had around 15 people, so it was very intimate. We spent the first hour or two on presentations, but really the rest of the day was generating ideas, working together and brainstorming, and sticking post-it notes everywhere. So that was really fun; I feel like we came up with a bunch of interesting ideas, and I made a lot of great connections that I hope to follow up on.” 

This year marked the first time CHI was held in Scotland. “My last name is Fraser, which is a [Scottish] clan, and my first name is also Scottish, so it was really cool to get to go and see a lot of the culture there and the history,” says Fraser. “I think it was a very welcoming place, which is nice for CHI; lots of bagpipes, lots of music everywhere, and everyone was very nice and very friendly.” 

The 2019 conference theme was “Weaving the Threads of CHI,” and CHI has once again proven to be an amazing platform to gather the greater HCI community to focus on advances in interactive technology. 


Pictured Left to Right: Nadir Weibel, Ailie Fraser, Dorothy Howard, Tricia Ngoon, Sean Kross, Steven Rick, Danilo Gasques Rodrigues

It might sound a little negative, but you don’t go to conferences to read papers and listen to talks. That’s a nice side effect of the fact that you’re all gathering under a common theme, so you can get together and listen to research and think about interesting stuff,” says Rick. “But at its core, you go for the network. You go to see people, to talk, to do stuff that’s not explicitly tied to the papers that are being presented. Because they’re all going to end up online, and you’ll read them later, and you hope that the talks give you something that’s not in the paper, and the conversations you have after the talks with the authors prompt an idea or thought that neither of you thought of, or build a collaboration or give you access to something that you didn’t have. You’re looking for a mutually beneficial social experience.


CHI 2019 Design Lab Publications:

How Guiding Questions Facilitate Feedback Exchange in Project-Based Learning, Amy Cook, Jessica Hammer, Salma Elsayed-Ali, and Steven P. Dow. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Inventive Scaffolds Catalyze Creative Learning, Tricia J. Ngoon. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Abstract from Doctoral Consortium

Managerial Visions: Stories of upgrading and maintaining the public restroom with IoT, Sarah Fox, Kiley Sobel, Daniela Rosner. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Practitioners Teaching Data Science in Industry and Academia, Sean Kross, Philip Guo. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

RePlay: Contextually Presenting Learning Videos Across Software Applications, C. Ailie Fraser, Tricia J. Ngoon, Mira Dontcheva, Scott Klemmer. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Social Applications for Inbodied Interaction: Improving Health Outcomes by Integrating Personal Knowledge, Community, and Data, Vineet Pandey. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Workshop Paper

Ways of Knowing When Research Subjects Care, Dorothy Howard, Lilly Irani. May 2019. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Read Next

Design Lab #wearenotwaiting Nightscout Openaps

How DIY Designers are Impacting Healthcare

#WeAreNotWaiting is the social media movement of folks in the diabetes community who have come…

Steven Dow And His Team Tackle Innovation In Crowdsourcing

As part of the Design Lab's graduate course work on Crowdsourcing taught by Steven Dow, students…

Design Forward Panel Discussion: Focusing on 2017

UC San Diego’s Design Lab recently teamed up with Axure Software Solutions, Inc. to cosponsor…

Tricia Ngoon

Tricia Ngoon, UCSD & Design Lab PhD Graduate, Discusses “Adaptive Conceptual Guidance”

Currently, in the spotlight of Tricia Ngoon’s research and involvement with The Design Lab is her recently accepted paper, Shöwn: Adaptive Conceptual Guidance Aids Example Use in Creative Tasks, which will appear in the Designing Interactive Systems virtual conference this summer, 2021. Her research hypothesizes that providing “adaptive conceptual guidance” will improve a person’s implementation of examples within creative work, as opposed to providing a static example. Using the domain of web comics, “[researchers in the study] present concepts to people alongside examples as they work.” Ngoon adds that “It’s essentially a step towards coaching. For example, if [a person is] working on a comic you might present a concept to consider the framing or kind of the composition of the panel and then [show] examples of different types of framing and composition.” Ultimately, her research concluded that “these adaptive suggestions as a person is working in context really help with making a clear and more unique story. It kind of changes the way they look at their ideas because they are more likely to explore different [ones].” 
Design Lab Ucsd Elderly

Design for older people sucks. Here are four ways to fix it

Digital Arts editorial with Stefan Sagmeister and Design Lab Director Don Norman on designing for sixty-somethings.

Beginning in May, Alive Ventures launched a series of ongoing panels titled “Old People are Cool, Design for Them Sucks”, aiming to open up a discussion with the design community on how to better design for older adults. John Zapolski, founder of Alive Ventures, and design thought leader Ayse Birsel of Birsel + Seck, hosted the series of discussions, with guests including design luminaries such as Stefan Sagmeister and Don Norman.

“When I would visit him in retirement homes, I would see people who needed walkers and wouldn’t use them because it was a stigma,” said Norman. “They were so ugly and it sort of shouts out to the world, ‘Hey I’m old and crippled and therefore probably feeble minded as well,’ right? Well no, it’s wrong. And so I noticed that, but I didn’t pay much attention until I myself reached my eighties and started looking at my friends and other things and realised that, yes, people shunned a lot of things that are being made to help them because they don’t like to admit publicly they have problems.” - Don Norman
Design Lab Design@large Wednesday Philip Guo

Design at Large Tackles Human-Centered Computational Tools

WHAT IS DESIGN@LARGE? A new wave of societal challenges, cultural values, and technological advancements is…

Back To Top